Updated September 23, 2012, 8:39 p.m. ET Makeover of 777 Agitates Boeing By Co. Is wrestling with one of the thorniest problems in business: How and when do you replace a successful product? The Herald/Associated Press Redesigning the 777 jet, pictured, has sparked infighting at Boeing. The aircraft giant’s big 777 twin jet needs a makeover, according to the airlines and lessors who have made the plane a mainstay on long-haul routes since its introduction in 1995. The 777 pays Boeing’s bills, delivering as much as $1.2 billion in revenue each month, based on its average sale price for the largest and most popular model, according to aviation consulting firm Avitas. That’s a lot of money to put at risk on a new design, but orders for the 777, which currently has no rival, are slowing as airlines anticipate the next generation of the jetliner and a competing model on the horizon from European plane maker Airbus. Infighting erupted this summer at Boeing over how to keep the cost of the new jet under control, company insiders and airline executives say. Panel 777 fmc phoenix flight view real version flying time. Page 12 Page 1 Boeing 777-200 PSS Microsoft Flightsimulator 2002 Aircraft. US$4 billion from Boeing, with an additional US$2 billion from suppliers. Important customers also are at odds over the aircraft’s final design. The internal debate has been amplified by Boeing’s missteps updating its single-aisle 737 and the years of delay and billions of dollars in cost overruns on its last big development project, the 787 Dreamliner. But much of the wrangling over how to build a new 777 with a realistic price tag is central to the complex process of designing a jetliner. “It is a thorough process, with ongoing robust discussions, to ensure we come to market with the right airplane, at the right time, leveraging the right technology and delivering the right economics,” Boeing said in a statement. Early this year, Boeing appeared to have a clear road map. Dubbed the 777X, the proposed revamped jet included a new wing, upgraded engines and other improvements to boost performance. But its plans aren’t as clear today, customers say. Boeing is moving aggressively to cut the cost of its ambitious new design, even though it is favored by Dubai-based Emirates Airline, the 777’s largest customer. “I’ve stressed to [Boeing Chief Executive] Jim McNerney that this was a product they should be seriously looking at. Cinefex armageddon. They were enthusiastic, and then it all seemed to go wrong,” said Tim Clark, Emirates’ CEO. Clark is expected to air his views again Thursday in a speech to the British American Business Council in Seattle, close to where Boeing makes the 777. Boeing landed more than 200 orders for 777s last year, including 50 more from Emirates, and plans to deliver roughly 100 of the planes next year. But Emirates’ latest order was “partly contingent” on converting some of those planes to the new 777X, says Mr. In August, Ray Conner, the new CEO of Boeing’s commercial unit, sought to dispel a report in the Seattle Times that work on the 777X program was slowing with a note to employees: “When we are satisfied with the risks, costs and schedule, as well as many other important factors, we intend to present a plan” to customers and the board of directors late in 2012 or early 2013. Boeing has had to make tough calls before. The company was forced to hastily revamp, rather than replace, its bestselling 737 single-aisle jet last year, after Corp., the parent of American Airlines, which previously maintained an all-Boeing fleet, split an order between Boeing and Airbus, a unit of Co., ordering hundreds of upgraded Airbus jets. Last year, distracted with getting its 787 Dreamliner and 747-8 jumbo jet into service and wrestling with the 737, Boeing’s 777X development program continued, but with less urgency, far from the spotlight of senior management. Lars Andersen, a former 777 program manager who had helped design the original plane in the 1990s, was called out of retirement to start on the 777X in 2010. He and his small team came up with what would be the most efficient commercial airplane ever sold, according to conversations with customers and documents obtained by The Wall Street Journal, eclipsing even the Dreamliner’s performance. What is CTCMS.exe? The.exe extension on a filename indicates an exe cutable file. Executable files may, in some cases, harm your computer. Therefore, please read below to decide for yourself whether the CTCMS.exe on your computer is a Trojan that you should remove, or whether it is a file belonging to the Windows operating system or to a trusted application. Ctcms exe error advisory. ![]() The plans shown to airlines were for a plane 21% more fuel-efficient than the latest model of the jet, the 777-300ER, costing 16% less to operate. The updated 777, with Dreamliner-inspired carbon-fiber composite wings, would be even larger than the company’s double-deck 747 jumbo jet. Boeing would stretch the body on two models and install new engines. After the cost overruns on the Dreamliner, Boeing, which was also spending money to update its 737 and to develop a new tanker for the U.S. Air Force, was looking to conserve resources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |